If you haven’t been paying attention to this story, you should.   It has everything that’s shitty about Philly politics all in one story, and it comes to a head this week:

  • Two felons
  • Fakers in suits and pantsuits
  • In-court drama
  • Out-of-court drama
  • Mental health clinics, but sadly nobody is a patient
  • All the candidates running for office except for 1 is a write-in
  • The one candidate on the ballot is a REPUBLICAN 😵
  • An election-day that’s likely to be filled with more drama
  • An election-eve vote counting scenario that is potentially going to have even more drama

Sadly, the only thing missing in this telenovela are hot guys with washboard abs who can’t keep their clothes on.  I don’t think there’s been a more ridiculous race for a Pennsylvania State Representative seat as long as I have lived in PA, much less as long as I’ve been on this planet.

This photo (below) was passed on to me showing that there is yet another write-in candidate who might have thrown his hat, or MSPaint-produced campaign banner, and gotten into the anything-can-happen race to replace disgraced state representative Leslie Acosta.

Why This Shitshow Started in The First Place

Long story short, and that’s very hard with this story so you’ll just have to bear with me here:  Leslie Acosta agreed to plead guilty in a conspiracy to commit money laundering charge related to a federal prosecution of Renee Tartaglione and Carlos Matos.  If those names sound familiar it’s because Carlos Matos is a former Federal felon but also a long-time Democratic ward leader in the 197th District who is well-known in Kensington.  Matos and Tartaglione are both being charged by the US Attorney over a Pennsylvania Medicaid billing scandal in relation to the Juniata Mental Health Center.  Leslie Acosta used to work there.  Los Federales accused Acosta of cashing checks out of the business and giving the proceeds to Tartaglione.  The fraud trial is expected to start this coming May.

Leslie Acosta kept the plea deal secret and didn’t tell anyone about it.   Unfortunately for her, the Pennsylvania Constitution does not allow anyone to sit in a public office who has a felony conviction.  Since her plea deal guarantees she’s going to get one on her record, that means she would have no choice but to step aside or she would be forced out of Harrisburg by the legislature who would eject her.   Acosta ran for re-election unopposed and won.   But after that, word finally got out about her plea deal.  Gov. Wolf begged Acosta to step aside but she refused.   Republicans in Harrisburg watching from afar proceeded to formally eject Acosta from the state capitol.  That forced her hand and she bowed out.   The legislature chose this coming Tuesday, March 21 to select a replacement for the district.

In a normal world, few if any voters turn up, nobody knows who the candidates are to fill-in the vacancy and the local Democratic machine usually installs some protegé of another politician to fill the role.   But in Planet Philadelphia things have gone wrong.  So. Horribly. Wrong.

He Doesn’t Live Here

Somehow the Democratic party in Philly thought it would be a good idea to allow a soon-to-be felon to help decide who her successor would be.  Leslie Acosta lobbied for a guy named Frederick Ramirez to replace her.   This photo of where Leslie Acosta’s state rep office is located tells you a lot about her chosen replacement:

Ahh yeah.   There’s Leslie Acosta’s office with her sign up on the 2nd floor and below her sign is a sign for another pill hut.  Er, sorry… did I say “pill hut?”  I meant to say “yet another mental health resource center.”    Because, you know, living in the 197th District with its shitty political representation problems can cause you to have a mental break and you might need these types of services to make sense of it all.

If you’ve ever spent enough time in the barrio you’ll start to wonder why there are so many mental health resource centers around.  I am sure it won’t surprise you at all that Frederick Ramirez also runs mental health clinics.   What will surprise you is that Fred Ramirez doesn’t actually live in the 197th District.

That pesky PA Constitution demands that you live next to the poor schmucks you want to represent in the state house.  Pennsylvania politicos have never taken that rule seriously since proving residency in a court challenge is quite difficult.   But it wasn’t difficult with Freddie Ramirez.   The Republican City Committee took Ramirez to court since in this election they did put a candidate on the ballot, Lucinda Little.   Republicans did not think it was fair that Ramirez was using a house he had converted to a storage locker around the corner from one of his clinics was sufficient for residency, especially so since Ramirez is listed in the Bristol, PA phonebook and has been a member of the Bristol rotary club for a long time.

On the witness stand, Ramirez stated that he does reside in the city–a lot.   Just not always at his house in the 197th District.   He testified that when he’s in town he stays at his daughter’s house.   The trouble with his answer there is that his daughter lives in Roxborough, which is not a neighborhood that’s inside the 197th District.   This testimony combined with 24 months of water bills showing almost no usage led Commonwealth Court judge Anne Covey to conclude that Ramirez doesn’t live here and therefore is disqualified from being a candidate on the ballot.

It also looks like someone didn’t take kindly to that news…

Threat received by Republican candidate Lucinda Little at her home (Photo: The Spirit of the Riverwards)

Too Late, Too Bad

Judge Covey’s decision threw Democrats into disarray.   What now?

After a fractious meeting at Philadelphia Democratic City Committee headquarters on a Saturday afternoon the seven ward leaders who screwed up their nomination of Ramirez then decided to put forward one of their own: Emilio Vazquez, a PPA employee.

There’s certainly nothing wrong with Vazquez as a candidate.  He lives in the district and he has a steady job.   He doesn’t have a platform or a plan for the district but that’s not a problem–the last two occupants of the 197th state rep seat didn’t either.  Sheriff Jewell Williams who is also one of the ward leaders of the district held this state rep seat for eleven years and did not write one solid piece of legislation to help the district out that entire time.   Democrats just needed a “butt-warmer”, that’s it.

The problem with Democrats putting Vazquez forward as a candidate is that his papers were filed way past the deadline to run as a candidate.   When the Republicans challenged Ramirez on his candidacy there was still over a week left to swap his name out and replace him with a different candidate.  The lockout expired during the course of the trial to kick Ramirez off the ballot.  Once that deadline passed, the state elections board would not accept any more filings.   The City Commissioner’s office followed-up with a statement that it had already started printing plates for the voting machines and was busy programming them–it’s too late to adapt the voting machines to a last-second change.

Democrats headed back to court anyway, this time praying for a miracle and it didn’t get it.  The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, possibly fearing future ramifications if it allowed election challenges to go on after voting machines were being set-up, threw out the appeal with a one-sentence denial order.

For the first time ever the Democratic party is forced to campaign for a seat they’ve held for over 50 years.

Progressives Can’t Get Their Shit Together Either

Besides Democrat vs. Republican court battles there was another trip to court by Green Party candidate Cheri Honkala.   Honkala didn’t get her paperwork filed correctly by the deadline and was denied a button on the voting machine.

Had everything proceeded normally Honkala would have not gotten any attention at all from local progressives over this state rep seat.  But thanks to Republicans knocking the Democrat off the ballot machine–not having that paperwork filed suddenly mattered.  A lot.

Sensing the possibility that there could be a race with no Democrat on the voting machine, Honkala and the Greens took their case to the PA Supreme Court.  They were shot down.

The Philly VOICE threw together this glowing-profile of Honkala.   It was only last year that local media only took interest in her for holding a fart-in at the DNC to get some local human-interest clicks.  [That’s a nice way of saying that most local media only considered Honkala to be a joke]

Suddenly all that has to be brushed aside because Holy Jesus there’s only a Republican on the voting machine and no one else.  Egads!

At community meetings Honkala has vowed to turn her state rep office into a homeless shelter if she’s elected.   Those will be the 6 luckiest people in the 197th District.   So if you’re homeless be sure to turn up to vote–you may win a bed!

More Court Drama Is Expected

If you think just the fight over the ballot was bad, I fully-expect there will be another battle over what happens on Election Day and later-on that evening when the votes are actually counted up.  Given that the electorate is 85% registered Democrats, the expected turnout on Tuesday will be super low and the chance of anyone winning this is the easiest it’s ever been a whole smattering of write-in candidates have surfaced.

First off: Norris Square is infamous for Election Day shenanigans.   Right around from Senator Christine Tartaglione’s house (and inside the 197th District) is a polling station where four election workers were charged and arrested for elections fraud.   This area has also been known for fistfights that have occurred outside polling stations and heavy amounts of electioneering with campaign workers campaigning inside polling stations and Spanish-speaking interpreters being accused of guiding voters hands to “preferred” candidates.   Mind you, this takes place in an area of the city where Democrats aren’t used to running with any opposition from other parties.  This crap happens when there’s Democrats challenging each other.

The second and much more likely source of court drama will be the outcome of write-in voting.   There are several scenarios that can happen in this special election:

Republican Lucinda Little could amass more votes than the total number of write-ins.  In which case, the election is pretty-much wrapped-up unless the break-down of the write-in candidates reveals one of the write-in candidates comes within a few votes shy of beating Little.

A write-in avalanche swamps the amount of votes for Little and one of the write-in candidates or more top Little’s vote tally, in which case everyone goes back to court to scrutinize the write-in tapes.

Or, and this is equally likely: a complete total shit show where Little and one or more of the write-ins amass close vote totals and it turns a three-way court battle where Little and two of the write-in candidates challenge opposing write-in votes.

Last but not least there’s one more lawsuit threat in the works.  Write-in candidate Orlando Acosta (no relation to Leslie) has vowed to challenge the legitimacy of the entire special election.  He ran as a write-in candidate when Leslie Acosta was originally up for re-election.   He contends that Leslie Acosta’s election was invalid at the time she ran therefore he should have been the declared-winner.  Because the PA Supreme Court did not weigh in on his petition he surmises that because they have weighed in on three other candidates (Cheri Honkala, Freddie Ramirez, Emilio Vazquez) they will re-visit Leslie Acosta’s re-election race.

No Democrat Poll Watchers Allowed

Oh yes, one more thing–and this is also causing lots of stomach cramps with the Democratic City Committee:   the City Commissioners has blocked registered Democrats from getting poll watcher certificates.   The reason: there is no Democratic candidate on the voting machines.   This means the only people allowed in a polling place this coming Tuesday are the election workers themselves, a Spanish-speaking interpreter and any Republican poll watcher holding a valid poll watcher certificate.

Poll watchers monitor for election law violations and report those up to the District Attorney’s office and their local party organization so lawyers can get engaged whenever there is any polling place shenanigans going on.

The Democratic City Committee went back to court to challenge this so they could get their poll watchers in and this too was shot down.

In total there have been 5 separate lawsuits over this one state rep seat.

This is the craziest local election ever, right?

Write-In Mania

Some folks have estimated there are as many as 30 different write-ins but I can tell you the confirmed total is really 6.    Here’s their profiles:

Edward Lloyd

Here’s his Facebook.

Edward Lloyd his own words:

My name is Edward Lloyd a long time and dedicated City and State Elected Committeeman 2nd and 3rd Senatorial Districts 42nd for 8 years, City Committeeman for 26 years and former Ward Chairman of the 42nd Ward, 6th and 21st Divisions some of you may know me and a few of you may have heard of me.

I still remember the words of my father Edward Lloyd, Sr.  My father said, “Son, I am a servant of the people.  An opportunity to help people means everything to me.”  When I would hear comments like these, it would only strengthen my resolve to follow in his footsteps in politics.  I knew at an early age watching my father that hard work paid off.  I shocked the so-called naysayers in 2009 when I won as a write in for Pennsylvania Democratic Executive State Committee serving the 2nd Senatorial District. This was a historic victory.  Now I’m beginning another historic campaign.  And I need you to be part of it.  I, respectfully and graciously ask for your support as the Write-In Candidate since the nominated candidate was recently removed by court order.

Presently, the Democrats cannot afford to lose this seat to the Republicans or any other party.  I have the easiest name as a Write-In “Ed Lloyd” and I have been somewhat successful in previous elections in getting voters to Write me.  In the past, I acquired the most Write-In Votes, but unfortunately I did not win enough votes to beat the incumbent. In spite of this, I never gave up fighting to represent the people in the 197th District, but with your support as the –Committeemen/Committeewomen in the 197th — Together” we can prevent losing this seat to the Republicans.  I am prepared to fight for this seat in the special election on March 21, 2017.  I am asking for your help.  Together we can win and I will not let you down.  All I am asking you for is an opportunity to serve the people.

Orlando Acosta

Here’s his Facebook.

Orlando Acosta is a perennial candidate for the 197th District.  He ran against Leslie Acosta (no relation).  After it was learned that she had secretly pled guilty to conspiracy for money laundering, Acosta filed a challenge in Commonwealth Court to have Leslie Acosta’s re-election victory invalidated.   Orlando Acosta was a write-in candidate last year and claimed in his suit that because Acosta’s candidacy was void, he should have won the state representative seat.

He has been a vocal critic of Leslie Acosta’s time serving as the 197th District state representative.

Cheri Honkala

Here’s her Facebook

Cheri Honkala is arguably the most famous of Philly’s perennial political candidates, second only to T. Milton Street, Sr.  She’s the leader for the Poor People’s Human Enonomic Rights Campaign.  An activist for over three decades, Cheri is well-known in Kensington for riding a horse at the famous intersection of K&A: Kensington and Allegheny Avenues when she ran for sheriff.

She’s also protested the lavish City expenditures put on the Pope visit by erecting a tent city and hosting a “fart-in” protest at the DNC.

While she’s the member of the Green Party and their endorsed candidate for this race, her name won’t appear on the ballot.  Honkala says the reason why is that they filed “one paper one day late” at the Pennsylvania Department of State.  For that she’s been excluded from the ballot on Mar 21.

Juan Rodriguez

Here’s his Facebook.

Probably one of the more esoteric perennial candidates out there is Juan Rodriguez, self-styled founder of “The Legend Foundation” which is a bootstrap community organization that does cleanups and helping out people in need.

He’s run for mayor in the past.

Emilio Vazquez

Here’s his Facebook.

Emilio Vazquez is the Democratic pick for the 197th District.  He’s an auditor at the Philadelphia Parking Authority and had to take a furlough from his job.

Vazquez doesn’t have a platform or anything other than “he’s a Democrat,”which in this district is the functional equivalent of saying “I breathe oxygen and convert it to carbon dioxide.”

We’re all willing to bet just about everyone running as a write-in except Honkala is also a Democrat or will behave like one when elected, so if anyone had any suspicions that an anti-immigration activist from the Bible Belt were somehow in this race, you’d have a greater chance of encountering the Chupacabra.

The district itself is 85% Democrat and even the Republican candidate on the machine was a Democrat for decades.

If you elect Vazquez, the Parking Authority CEO Clarena Tolson (we all love her) will have to find a 20-something Democrat who has some relationship to a Democratic ward leader to replace him with.  Maybe Vazquez will pick his successor like Acosta did?

Tags: | | | | | | |


This is Freddie Ramirez.  I wrote about him last week because he wants to become a State Representative for West Kensington and Fairhill in the 197th District in Harrisburg.   He owes the state thousands of dollars in back income taxes.

The previous occupant of that state rep. seat, Leslie Acosta, was booted out because she was convicted and sentenced for her role in a money laundering scheme related to a health clinic in Juniata.  Governor Wolf even begged her to resign her seat.  She refused.   She then lobbied Democratic ward leaders to hand-pick Ramirez as her replacement and won.  The Democrats put Ramirez forward as their candidate for the 197th.

There is just one problem:  there is a growing body of evidence that strongly suggests he doesn’t live here.

The Pennsylvania Constitution states in Article 2 Section 5 that state representatives must live in the district that they want to represent for one year before the date of election.  The special election to replace Acosta is March 21, just weeks away.

The Invisible Neighbor

In Commonwealth Court today the Republican City Committee presented evidence that Freddie Ramirez is rarely if-ever seen at his home located at 430 West Annsbury Street.

Is anybody home? 430 West Annsbury, the registered home of Frederick Ramirez
Is anybody home? 430 West Annsbury, the registered home of Frederick Ramirez

This Google Street View photo taken in September 2014 long before his entry into politics shows weeds at Mr. Ramirez’s house growing out of control and crawling up the burglar bars on the first floor and a rose bush that has reached the hight of the first floor kitchen windows.   The rear yard consists of a masonry wall with badly overgrown plants and broken fences. (Click here to tour the outside).

Two witnesses who live on the block came to testify.  One witness said she had never seen Mr. Ramirez enter or leave the house since she moved in.   Another witness who lives directly across the street from Ramirez testified that she neither saw Mr. Ramirez coming and going from the house and also has never seen trash put out for collection for that house as opposed to the other houses on the same block which are occupied.

Water Analysis

Over 20 months of Mr. Ramirez’s electricity and water bills were entered into the record.  Philadelinquency pulled Mr. Ramirez’s most recent water statement and this is what we came up with:


Mr. Ramirez’s water bill for January is $27.87 which is the lowest water bill you can possibly have for a residential row-home and not be on public assistance.  That amount represents 0CCF water usage as the amount you owe solely consists of basic charges.

I’ll use my own water bill to explain:


This is the last bill I got from the Water Revenue Bureau.   I normally only pay my water bill about 3 times a year because this is the only utility I have that still to this day does not support a BillPay service that everyone gets for free with their bank’s checking account.   I refuse to give access to my checking account to a City agency, much less a City-owned company.

My stormwater charges are exactly the same as Mr. Ramirez’s:  $14.12

A service charge of $13.75 is assessed on every water bill for every residential rowhome in Philadelphia.  The technical term for it is “Meter Type R”.  The Service Charge includes a water fee of $6.58 and a sewer fee of $7.17.   $6.58 plus $7.17 equals $13.75.  Simple enough.

You should be able to see where I’m going with this:   the only way you can have a bill for $27.87 in a rowhome is if you showed 0CCF of water usage.

If you look carefully at the water account summary, Mr. Ramirez showed a payment of $30 in January against his account and a current balance of $25.74.

Mr. Ramirez has a $25.74 balance because he didn’t use enough water in December and got a bill for $27.87.  He overpaid that bill with his $30 payment by $2.13 and when you subtract January’s water bill by $2.13 you arrive at his current water balance.

During court testimony Mr. Ramirez’s water bills were read aloud.   He recorded 0CCF water usage on his water bill for several months in a row before he would finally tick the meter over.

I guess Fred Ramirez for State Representative doesn’t ever bathe and certainly doesn’t do his laundry at home.  The only way that I know of achieving 0CCF water usage for 3 months in a row for several stretches over 24 months is to never bathe, rarely flush the toilet, don’t do laundry at home and to eat off paper plates all the time.

Perhaps instead of showering he uses baby wipes?

Bristol, PA

So if it’s possible that Fred Ramirez doesn’t live on Annsbury Street in Philadelphia, then where does he live?

A source that doesn’t want to be named provided me an address with where he claims Mr. Ramirez could be spending a lot of his time.  That address points to the Delaview Apartments on Radcliffe Road.  I decided to follow up on this and started looking.

Mr. Ramirez seems to be pretty involved with the Bristol community.   For instance:


That photo I found from a newsletter mentioning the Bristol Rotary Club.  The man in that photo looks an awful lot like a younger version of the Mr. Ramirez I saw in court today.  In fact it’s from 2010.



Then there’s the White Pages with a VERY interesting listing that matches Mr. Ramirez’s name and age.


Well… do I really need to show any more evidence here that Mr. Ramirez doesn’t live in Philly?

Despite All This, He Expects You To Vote For Him

I don’t think I have really ever seen anyone disqualified from a Philadelphia election because they don’t live in the district they’re running in, much less even inside the state.   It’s easier to prove a first degree murder case on flimsy circumstantial evidence than it is to prove residency before a Pennsylvania judge, even if you paid a private investigator to tag that person for months to show that they don’t live in the city.

The most famous example of this adage is none other than T. Milton Street, Sr. the brother of the former Philadelphia mayor John Street.   Milton Street has been challenged multiple times over his residency.  In 2015 he defeated a ballot challenge before the Pennsylvania Supreme Court without the services of a lawyer representing him.  In both instances he was accused of living in Moorestown, New Jersey.  Many of his Facebook postings on his personal page are geo-tagged to Moorestown.

When asked by lawyers representing appellants: “where do you go to bed at night?” he famously replied “I sleep where I get tired.”


Seriously, Democrats: when faced with replacing a convicted criminal in a voting district that’s well-beyond 80% Democrat, this person is the best you could come up with?   This is the safest State Representative district in the entire state.  You could have picked anyone, and I mean ANYONE, to replace Ms. Acosta.

You couldn’t find someone who has neighborhood bona-fides who you’re certain actually lives here?

Tags: | | |